<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Monday Morning Economist</title>
	<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>Populist Economic Insights and Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Obama vs. Speculators</title>
		<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=253</link>
		<comments>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=253#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 07:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Commodity Futures Trading Commission]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[gas prices]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gop]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Las Vegas]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ever since passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, speculators have been empowered to own the commodities markets through manipulation.&#160; It’s an enormously complex and agonizingly obscure field of investment, fraught with anti-manipulation law and oversight dating back to regulations imposed during the Great Depression.&#160; The CFMA relieved much of the legal penalties [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since passage of the Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, speculators have been empowered to own the commodities markets through manipulation.&#160; It’s an enormously complex and agonizingly obscure field of investment, fraught with anti-manipulation law and oversight dating back to regulations imposed during the Great Depression.&#160; The CFMA relieved much of the legal penalties of really clever and really big money cornering markets and extorting money out of an economy that’s just trying to buy raw materials for it’s own consumption.&#160; Honest consumers, both businesses and individuals, it seems are perfect rubes to be ripped off by the unscrupulous Wall Street.</p>
<p>Wall Street seems to rely on some pretty flimsy arguments to justify a laissez faire commodities market.&#160; The most egregious platitudes appear <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/dont-blame-speculators-for-market-moves-2012-04-18?link=MW_story_popular">here</a>, where Aaron Brown of <a href="http://www.minyanville.com/">Minyanville</a>.&#160; argues that commodities speculation is just like Las Vegas.&#160; It’s a victimless crime he says, because commodity speculation is just like betting on a ball game.&#160; It can’t affect the outcome of the game.&#160; Unfortunately for him, no amount or persiflage can make that analogy work.</p>
<p>The difference is that the the outcome of the game is, in fact, affected by this particular kind of bet.&#160; Speculators buying futures drives up the cost of the futures on which consumers rely to make purchases for the next business cycle.&#160; People that will actually consume the product, oil in the most topical instance, will have to take actual delivery of and pay the price established by speculators for it.&#160; The speculators, meanwhile, have never intended to consume the oil, just to drive up the price and reap a profit from inflating the price themselves and then roll that profit over to further distort the next futures cycle.&#160; As speculator’s money inflates the price of product, there are losers, and those losers are the people who will actually have to pay the futures contract price, take delivery of it and consume it, ultimately the public.&#160; As the law is now, it’s legalized extortion by billionaires.</p>
<p>To a lesser extent, the same activity goes on in the stock market.&#160; A big player can create demand&#160; for a stock by running up the price himself and then selling to the rubes that want to buy a stock that is going up.&#160; There is no one as ruthless as the most ruthless of easy money speculators, and the more money you have the easier it all is.&#160; There’s a lot of money in the hands of the 1% that is up to exactly this kind of mischief.&#160; It would probably do them and the public a great deal of good to surtax some of that back into the real economy.&#160; As it is, big money is just eating away at the economy on which big money depends to make money.&#160; It’s manifestly stupid.</p>
<p>Having the commodities futures market open to non consumers of the product does serve a purpose though.&#160; It helps prevent a big consumer of oil from dominating the market for its own benefit and grabbing up all the product with its purchasing power and reselling it at an artificially high price that it created itself, exactly what outside speculators in oil are doing now.&#160; Again, the people that need the oil are just at the mercy of big money.&#160; This potential and actual behavior by markets is the poster child for government regulation of markets.&#160; Free markets really only work when everyone’s resources and information are the same.</p>
<p>Obama aims to reign in <a href="http://articles.marketwatch.com/2012-04-17/economy/31353350_1_gas-prices-president-barack-obama-keystone-xl">speculation</a> or at least make it a political knuckle ball for a Republican dominated congress to deal with.&#160; It’s fair.&#160; The Republicans who deregulated commodities trading should have to deal with the consequences of that deregulation rather the he.</p>
<p>Republicans aim to cash in politically on the very problems their ideology in policy caused for this nation.&#160; Obama is now in the process of making that obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=253</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trayvon Martin, Draftee</title>
		<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=252</link>
		<comments>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=252#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trayvon&#8217;s life is over. There is no going back to when he is still alive. There is no longer sound of his playing and joking. There is no coping with his troubles nor celebrating his successes. There is no hugging him under your shoulder and no fixing his dinner. You can no longer kiss his [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trayvon&#8217;s life is over. There is no going back to when he is still alive. There is no longer sound of his playing and joking. There is no coping with his troubles nor celebrating his successes. There is no hugging him under your shoulder and no fixing his dinner. You can no longer kiss his forehead. You can no longer pray for his future. You will no longer see him walk into a room.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t speak to the endurance it takes to be black in America today. I can&#8217;t know the first hand truths of living as someone in a society with a legacy of hate towards me. I never have.</p>
<p> <a href="http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=252#more-252" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=252</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Scarlet Letter</title>
		<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=251</link>
		<comments>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=251#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hester Prynne, sympathetic heroine of The Scarlet Letter; Nathaniel Hawthorne, suffered fictional but historically accurate indignities for her adultery. The novel was set in 1642. It now seems as if the Tea Party, ALEC, and the Koch Brothers are leading us on a sentimental (for them) journey for the country back to that time of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hester Prynne, sympathetic heroine of The Scarlet Letter; Nathaniel Hawthorne, suffered fictional but historically accurate indignities for her adultery. The novel was set in 1642. It now seems as if the <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/161973/koch-connection">Tea Party, ALEC, and the Koch Brothers</a> are leading us on a sentimental (for them) journey for the country back to that time of intrusive intolerance, misogyny and brutality towards women and everyone else that is not a member of the white male fraternity of the self important.</p>
<p> <a href="http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=251#more-251" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=251</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health Care Is Not Broccoli</title>
		<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=250</link>
		<comments>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=250#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To listen to our Supreme Court justices Tuesday, you’d think they were shopping for produce rather than reviewing the law.  It seemed so because the arguments devolved to how is broccoli different from health care.  Verrilli seemed unable to explain the difference in a meaningful way.
Conservatives and their pet judges, as always, fear the slippery [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To listen to our Supreme Court justices Tuesday, you’d think they were shopping for produce rather than reviewing the law.  It seemed so because the arguments devolved to how is broccoli different from health care.  Verrilli seemed unable to explain the difference in a meaningful way.</p>
<p>Conservatives and their pet judges, as always, fear the slippery slope to more progressive legislation.  The conservative judges argue a slippery slope of government mandating health insurance while their legislative counterparts make law mandating women buy an intentionally punitive vaginal sonogram in order to proceed to a perfectly legal abortion.  At the same time they don’t seem to think turning elections into auctions with victory going to the highest bidder is a slippery slope.  Maybe because Citizens United is more of a free fall than a slope?</p>
<p> <a href="http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=250#more-250" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=250</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Most Dangerous Man to America is Paul Ryan</title>
		<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=249</link>
		<comments>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=249#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 04:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Ryan, (R) Wisconsin, just re-released his Roadmap for America’s Future.  To him it may still seem to be a roadmap, but it’s actually more like some defective GPS system that’s insisting you to drive off the wet end of a pier backwards.
Democracy is all about ideas.  But in order for an idea to enter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Ryan, (R) Wisconsin, just re-released his Roadmap for America’s Future.  To him it may still seem to be a roadmap, but it’s actually more like some defective GPS system that’s insisting you to drive off the wet end of a pier backwards.</p>
<p>Democracy is all about ideas.  But in order for an idea to enter the market place of ideas, it should have some merit.  Ryan’s latest plan is simply a recycled copy of his last budget plan which was so vehemently rejected by the public the last time that it’s just stupefying that he would re-introduce it.</p>
<p> <a href="http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=249#more-249" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=249</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arizona, You Can&#8217;t Change the Constitution by not Understanding It</title>
		<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=247</link>
		<comments>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=247#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Arizona legislature is the latest collection of medieval throwbacks to attempt to contravene the contraceptive coverage mandate coming from the Affordable Care Act.  Their AZ 2625, includes new language that attempts to exempt employers from providing contraceptive prescriptions on moral grounds.  Their AZ2625 language appears intended to allow any employer to abstain from providing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Arizona legislature is the latest collection of medieval throwbacks to attempt to contravene the contraceptive coverage mandate coming from the Affordable Care Act.  Their <a href="http://e-lobbyist.com/gaits/text/596074">AZ 2625</a>, includes new language that attempts to exempt employers from providing contraceptive prescriptions on moral grounds.  Their AZ2625 language appears intended to allow any employer to abstain from providing contraceptive coverage due to moral objection with the exception of medical necessity.  Medical necessity, that is, other than the arguable medical necessity of avoiding unplanned pregnancy.  It’s an obvious circumventing of the  popular argument coming from the left that contraceptive drugs are of crucial medical importance to some small numbers of women.  The Arizona language is low information voter influence shrewd, but without legal merit.</p>
<p> <a href="http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=247#more-247" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=247</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clint Whispers, Conservatives Cringe</title>
		<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=246</link>
		<comments>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=246#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Softly, he speaks softly, Eastwood whispered the thing that is on everyone’s mind.  We need to pull together, as families, as communities, as states of the union and as a nation.  His halftime Super Bowl ad for Chrysler, purposely akin to a coach exhorting his team to victory, channeled a long remembered can do spirit [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Softly, he speaks softly, Eastwood whispered the thing that is on everyone’s mind.  We need to pull together, as families, as communities, as states of the union and as a nation.  His halftime Super Bowl ad for Chrysler, purposely akin to a coach exhorting his team to victory, channeled a long remembered can do spirit now lost in America seeking a public to embrace it.  At any other crucial moment in our brief history as a nation, this modest if cinematically impactful thirty seconds would have universally praised as art inspiring us to realize our most noble natures of team, common interest and country.</p>
<p> <a href="http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=246#more-246" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=246</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich (Almost) Does the Nation a Service</title>
		<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=245</link>
		<comments>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=245#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich, in the effort to depose Mitt Romney as the front runner in the GOP presidential primary, was prepared to sensationalize the practice of corporate raiding in the South Carolina Republican Primary.  With ad buys and a half hour “politimentary” movie, Newt was going to paint a picture for public consumption of what it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newt Gingrich, in the effort to depose Mitt Romney as the front runner in the GOP presidential primary, was prepared to sensationalize the practice of corporate raiding in the South Carolina Republican Primary.  With ad buys and a half hour “politimentary” movie, Newt was going to paint a picture for public consumption of what it is investment bankers (corporate raiders) actually do to make money.  Party pressures, the GOP upper caste was appalled, persuaded the “anti-establishment” Gingrich to drop the topic.  Too bad.  Too bad for Newt and for the public.</p>
<p> <a href="http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=245#more-245" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=245</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupying History</title>
		<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=243</link>
		<comments>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=243#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 05:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Herrington</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economic Crisis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gop]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[occupywallstreet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All power is derived from the people.  It always has been.  In the last 600 decades, power has been concentrated and dispersed many times.  “Occupy” (everything) is about to accomplish that dispersal again.  It’s what this country and it’s people were forged to do.
Some might consider “Occupy” is late to the cause.  Voices on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All power is derived from the people.  It always has been.  In the last 600 decades, power has been concentrated and dispersed many times.  “Occupy” (everything) is about to accomplish that dispersal again.  It’s what this country and it’s people were forged to do.</p>
<p>Some might consider “Occupy” is late to the cause.  Voices on the left have augured and pined for a public display for a decade or more.  The North African nations led this now global movement to the streets.  They led because they had less cushion to absorb further impoverishment at the hands of global banking and business.  They did show the future though.  How long would it be before an American set himself on fire publically as did Tunisia’s Mohamed Bouazizi, touching off a civil coup de tat of an Arab tyrant, and then another.  “Occupy”, never is, though,  the only too late.</p>
<p> <a href="http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=243#more-243" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=243</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retiring the National Debt By Not Destroying the Economy</title>
		<link>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=45</link>
		<comments>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=45#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 18:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Herrington</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Bush Tax Cuts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[department of defense]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economic Crisis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Gop]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[medicaid]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[medicare]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[National Debt]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[trade imbalance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP proposes social spending cuts in order to fund tax cuts as a solution for our national debt.  They, and the Beltway press, are undeterred by the OMB finding that their Paul Ryan authored plan will do nothing of the sort.  They are also undeterred by economist’s warnings that social spending cuts are the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP proposes social spending cuts in order to fund tax cuts as a solution for our national debt.  They, and the Beltway press, are undeterred by the OMB finding that their Paul Ryan authored plan will do nothing of the sort.  They are also undeterred by economist’s warnings that social spending cuts are the worst possible cuts in terms of economic impact, that they will shrink the economy and thus actually shrink revenues and make the deficit worse rather than better. <a href="http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?p=45#more-45" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mondaymorningeconomist.com/wordpress/?feed=rss2&amp;p=45</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

